Talk:History of perfume

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.examiner.com/a-640028~Rome_Show_Features_Ancient_Perfumes.html

  Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of perfume. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150208043220/http://www.everythinkaboutperfume.com/history.html to http://www.everythinkaboutperfume.com/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The Latin origins of the word 'perfume'

The articles makes a very common, but misleading claim, and I wonder if it might be worth correcting it here.

The claim is: "The word perfume is used today to describe scented mixtures and is derived from the Latin word, "per fumus," meaning through smoke."

A few things about this:

First, per fumus is two words, not one.

Second, per- when used as a prefix to a verb does not mean "through"; rather, it is an intensifier that means something more along the lines of "to do X thoroughly", where X is the verb, in this case fumāre. This is already noted in the wiktionary article (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/parfum#Etymology_3).

Third, it is not clear that the etymology is Latin. The terms perfume, parfum, profumo, etc., probably derive from a verb like profumare, definitely not from an adverbial phrase like per fumus ("through or by means of smoke"). Whatever the verb was, it probably meant something similar to the verb to incense. However, I can't find a single classical or late Latin example of the verb perfumare. I also can't find a source that gives one. There could be a Medieval Latin verb or one in a later dialect, but I haven't come across any attestations. Does anyone know if there is a proper history here? Does Susan Stewart mention this in her new book?

I think a solution to this issue could be helpful for people who come to this page. I would be very interested to hear what more experienced editors think and what they think would be the best way to make any changes.

Just to note: I am not an experienced editor, but I am a classicist and historian of science and medicine.

Ancientmedicine (talk) 16:56, 2 February 2023 (UTC)