Jump to content

Talk:Hudson River bomb plot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge

[edit]

I'd suggest that these two articles be merged into just a discussion of the plot, unless/until more biographical information about Hammoud ever comes to light. Better to concentrate our work on improving a single article for readers to view and learn from :) Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 22:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a reasonable suggestion, though it looks like the Arabic press is starting to gear up for personal exposés on Hammoud and his family (there's a picture of Hammoud in Canada on Talk:Assem_Hammoud) while western media's focusing on the plot and it's details. It's unclear how quickly we'll be given tactical/operational details of the plot vs. personal details of Hammoud and whether there's any clarity in separating them. DarAlHarb 17:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the merger. It would only clutter the Hudson River bomb plot article. --Falcorian (talk) 05:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried a merge today, without actually deleting anything from Hammoud's personal article. But I think all the information is now contained within this article succinctly. Does it look too crowded? I don't personally think so, but welcome opinions Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 00:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


  • I'd support a merger. You could follow some of the structure of the similar Miami bomb plot to attack the Sears Tower. Like that case, there's no actual event behind this, more an unfolding of media reports and filings of evidence that quantifies stuff that actually happened. It's very valid information, because it documents the actual imprint on our collective memory. I think spawning off pages for each of the suspects is way too much, unless they are known for something else apart from this incident. Goatchurch 11:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

possible factual inaccuracies

[edit]

The article currently states that: "This was unfeasible because the tunnel is embedded in bedrock, and the target is above sea level".

First, it wasn't just one tunnel they were looking at (or at least that's the claim). There are two PATH (kind of a subway) tunnels between NYC and New Jersey, and there are also the vehiclar ones.

Second, parts of the tunnels are resting right against the river (water) with just maybe a few feet of soft silt between them. And third, while the street level and higher floors of the buildings are above sea level, the basements and utility ducts are under it.

When the WTC was destroyed, there was plenty of concern that its "bathtub" would breach, and that river water would pour into the subways and into financial district buildings. Both the subway system and PATH built giant concrete "plugs" in their respective tunnels to hold back the water. wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Picture

[edit]

larger mugshot DarAlHarb 17:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hudson River bomb plot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hudson River bomb plot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]