From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


this article has agian been marked for deletion but no reason to delete has been given, removing deletion mark until a reason is posted.

This group won the Contemporary Acapella Recording Award, which seems to be a major award in the a capella world. Perhaps some mention of it would help the notability argument? Kyaa the Catlord 13:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Offthedockcover.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Offthedockcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Major Revamping[edit]

I've just finished a major revamping of this article. It was filled to the brim with external links and adverts for that book that just came out about Acapella. I dont know if other articles have had this problem, but it looked like the publishers just came in and threw up peacock terms left and right. The refs are bare, but I'm hoping a bot will come by and fix those... other than that, the article looks much much better. Qb | your 2 cents 12:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, I went and clear cut the book's Critical Response as well as the list of alumni that went back pretty far. Completely not needed IMHO. Qb | your 2 cents 12:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hullabahoos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)