Talk:Hydroxyethyl starch

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Hydroxyethyl starch.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Proposed merge with pentastarch

Oppose. Pentastarch is a subset of hydroxyethyl starch. It is worthy of its own page. Nephron T|C 05:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hydroxyethyl

Hydroxyethyl redirects to ethanol. Should it not redirect to Hydroxyethyl starch? Greswik (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of reference unclear

^ Zander R, Boldt J, Engelmann L, Mertzlufft F, Sirtl C, Stuttmann R (January 2007). "[The design of the VISEP trial. Critical appraisal"] (in German). Anaesthesist 56 (1): 71–7. doi:10.1007/s00101-006-1122-4. PMID 17192828. http://www.springerlink.com/content/q3053v24116050k2/.

This reference has two problems for English Wikipedia. First it is in German. Secondarily and more potentially important it appears to self refer to work by one of its authors, Boldt J who has had one paper retracted on HES due to both ethical problems and inability to relate the raw data to that actually published and many others retracted due to ethical problems. Cheers 91.84.69.219 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC). This reference should be deleted.As already Said ist references non Peer reviewed Data.One Author Joachim Boldt has been Fired from his Hospital due to fraud. 88 of his Papers have been retracted as no ethics Approval.Furthermore,the Autors of visep hav Published a Debütalbum to this,also in German,which is Not Cited. Brunkhorst !Anästhesist 2008. Also the follow up studies like 6s ,Chest prove,that the Arguments in this Article are invalid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.226.91.201 (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hydroxyethyl starch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130701042138/http://www.mhra.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Pressreleases/CON287028 to http://www.mhra.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Pressreleases/CON287028

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Safety info comparison

Maybe interesting for incorporating safety info into the article: Wiedermann, Christian J, and Klaus Eisendle. "Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch Regulatory Summaries From the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency." Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice 10, no. 1 (2017): doi:10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6 (For instance, should liver also be mentioned?) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Hi all, there are some new developments The regulators PRAC of EMA want to ban HES in the EU. This is quite importanthttp://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/news/2018/01/news_detail_002882.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c1. see link. however I was not able to place it in the article, excuse my ignorance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DE:2BDE:D869:79C0:F769:C883:8E86 (talk) 13:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]