Talk:Hyperdiffusionism
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"all logical and great things"
[edit]"Hyperdiffusionism is a hypothesis stating that one civilization or people is the creator of all logical and great things which are then diffused to less civilized nations."? Not a good start to an article in my opinion. What is 'logical' about a pyramid? I think we need to find a better definition. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Here are another way the concept is described, I agree our current wording is quite lacking. Im not claiming this link as a source, just as ideas on how to phrase the intro
- [1] "Hyperdiffusionism is the idea that when different cultures share particular elements, one culture must have adapted it from the other"
Maybe something like "Hyperdiffusionism is a hypothesis which argues that similarities between distant cultures in areas such as art, architecture, religious elements, implies a common ancestor civilization that disseminated the roots of the divergent cultures."
Here is a good academic source giving some background, but unfortunately does not provide a nice concise definition for us to clone [2] Gaijin42 (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Something like that. See [3] , [4], [5], [6], and an article by the guy who coined the term and we don't mention:[7].(see [8] also). There are more. And a search on GBooks on the word shows a lot of sources to use to add it to articles. Dougweller (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Unknown-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Unknown-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Archaeology articles
- Unknown-importance Archaeology articles
- C-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles