Talk:Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleImperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 28, 2008.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 31, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
April 5, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
April 14, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 8, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

ITAE family[edit]

The Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition family of articles now numbers 30 articles, including 21 biographies of personnel and one cat biography. Details are tabled below.

Article Name Current rating
Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition FA
Ross Sea party FA
Aurora's Drift GA
Voyage of the James Caird Start-class
Endurance (1912 ship) B
Aurora (ship) B
List of personnel not rated
Ernest Shackleton FA
Frank Wild stub
Perce Blackborow Start-class
Alfred Cheetham Start-class
Robert Clark (biologist) B
Tom Crean GA
Victor Hayward not rated
Frank Hurley Start-class
Ernest Joyce FA
Aeneas Mackintosh FA
Alexander Macklin Start-class
James McIlroy Start-class
Harry McNish FA
Thomas Orde-Lees Start-class
James Paton (seaman) not rated
Dick Richards Start-class
Arnold Spencer-Smith B
Joseph Stenhouse not rated
John Vincent (sailor) Start-class
Ernest Wild not rated
James Wordie Start-class
Frank Worsley Start-class
Mrs Chippy Start-class

List started on 14 April 2008 and updated since then. Most recent update: 18:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Consolidated bibliography[edit]

The following is a bibliography for all books cited, or listed as further reading, in the ITAE group of articles as listed. It does not include on-line sources.

Splendid article[edit]

Congratulations to everyone involved in this. It was a real pleasure to see something so informative and well-put together on the main page, instead of the usual rubbish about computer games or sportsmen or pop culture figures. I enjoyed reading it very much and it has spurred me on to find out more about such Antarctic expeditions. Well done all. 86.162.203.2 (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC) Please try to refrain from making a potential villan out of Thomas Orde-Lees. He was obviously correct and his objection to not stockpile fresh meat when it was available. Of cannibalism his comment could have been made in any tounge in cheek fashion. He survived as all those brave men did, is that not whats important here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.50.57 (talk) 04:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

News -- Brandy and Whisky Recovered[edit]

Not sure where to put this. Perhaps someone more familiar with the articles can place it appropriately. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/8499931.stm Victor Engel (talk) 00:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AllSafeAllWell.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:AllSafeAllWell.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World War I[edit]

The United Kingdom declared war on Germany on 4 August 1914 and the expedition left Plymouth 4 days later. I know little about conscription in WW1, but was there a reason why the crew weren't recalled for war duty at a later date when conscription was implemented? Was it because they were too hard to contact? Or did the government see national morale boosting value in the continuance of their expedition? Or was conscription not applied to every man of fighting age? 86.133.212.6 (talk) 11:08, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conscription wasn't implemented in the Empire immediately upon declaring war for the simple reason that no-one knew how long or how serious the fighting would be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.10.189 (talk) 10:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy[edit]

The same shortened version of this article is scattered throughout Wikipedia, in every article related to the expedition. Can someone please replace them with Hyperlinks? Thanks. (I would do it myself, but right now don't want to cope with all the vitriol an IP has to suffer to change anything of substance.)91.10.5.43 (talk) 01:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image with map and timeline of the path of the crew added[edit]

I added a visualization of the expedition, from Endurance beset to the final rescue. There is a timeline within the map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucaWist (talkcontribs) 17:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image with map and timeline of the path of the crew added[edit]

I added a visualization of the expedition, from Endurance beset to the final rescue. There is a timeline within the map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucaWist (talkcontribs) 17:10, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Could someone look at the "External links section for trimming? Things sometimes just creep in but 10 is excessive. 3-5 would be an acceptable number without claims of link farming. Otr500 (talk) 06:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Personnel - Hypothetical "Men Wanted" advertisement[edit]

I saw this image of the hypothetical advertisement in an unrelated story on Ars Technica. While it could be a fake, it doesn't have the air of a fake. The URL implies it's something to do with the Smithsonian (magazine), which is a source I would tend to treat as reliable, barring any contra-indications. A question for font experts: Is the font used in the clipping any use in narrowing down candidate newspapers?. Philh-591 (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone is in a position to look up a Smithsonian Magazine archive in a library, the URL also implies a date of 9 Oct 2013 or 10 Sept 2013 for an article about Shackleton, depending on whether the hinted at date is in US American order or not. Philh-591 (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for wasting your time. The Smithsonian Magazine article turns out to be an article scotching the idea that there was an advertisement, with this image as an illustration and notes that exhaustive newspaper archive searches have turned up nothing. Also I notice that the image uses the American spelling of "honor", which I suppose is a hint that it's not for real. Philh-591 (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]