Talk:In My Place

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the In My Place article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

In My Place has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 18, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
October 17, 2008	Good topic candidate	Promoted
March 5, 2021	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted

Current status: Good article

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coldplay Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coldplay, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Coldplay on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColdplayWikipedia:WikiProject ColdplayTemplate:WikiProject ColdplayColdplay articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:In My Place/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Lead

Every sentence of the first paragraph except the first starts "The song ..." I would suggest trying to come up with some alternatives.
- How does it look? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Much better. Just one or two subtle changes can have a huge impact on the flow. Peanut4 (talk) 21:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Awesome. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"It song was also nominated for two MuchMusic Video Awards in 2003 in the categories of Best international video–group and People's Choice: Favorite international group." "It song was ..." I presume should either by "It was" or "The song was"
- Fixed. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Background

"But when band member, Jonny Buckland played the song on his guitar," Shouldn't really start sentences with but. I suggest that "However, ..." does the same job here.
- Fixed. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music and lyrics

"The three lines of the third verse allude to a man who loves a woman who does not reciprocate." who ... who ... makes this sentence difficult to understand.
- How 'bout now? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Release

When was it released in the UK?
- Same as the US date. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"In 2005, "Speed of Sound", the lead single of the band's third album, X&Y, ranked number two.[20] "Speed of Sound" was marked as Coldplay's most successful single until "Viva la Vida", in which the song reached number one in 2008." I don't understand what relevance these two sentences have to "In My Place"?
- It means that both "In My Place" and "Speed of Sound" came close to becoming number one, but never did. The only number one song was "Viva la Vida". -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I see. I've made one slight change to try and highlight that. Had any previous Coldplay song reached number one? If not it might be worth re-writing the final sentence to something like "No other Coldplay songs had reached as high as number two until Viva ..." At the moment it doesn't quite explain the relevance. Peanut4 (talk) 21:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - You'd think that maybe "Yellow" or "Clocks" be number one, but never made it to number one. Yeah, I know what you mean and "Viva la Vida" is the only Coldplay song to reach number. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - It makes full sense now. I would add one thing to explain that it was the first Coldplay song to reach number two - I would add a new sentence between "The song reached number eighteen on Billboard's Hot Modern Rock Tracks in 2002." and "In 2005, "Speed of Sound"," Peanut4 (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        I added a bit, don't know if that makes sense or not. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        I've given it a slight tweak. You might want to add a reference. Peanut4 (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

This might just be me. But what does "by-the-numbers" mean?
- Minute-for-minute of the song performance. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put it on hold while the above matters are dealt with. Peanut4 (talk) 21:16, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just one minor point above. Peanut4 (talk) 21:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Again meets all the GA criteria and good to see a different kind of image. I might possibly suggest explaining the "by-the-numbers" above, and also add a reference to my slight tweak. Other than that, good luck with any future improvements. Peanut4 (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added a ref. to the statement you wrote and will explain the number-by-number info. Thanks for the review, it is most appreciated. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Sorry. Not really sure what I'm doing. Anyways, I noticed that nowhere on the page does it mention that the song is featured in the game "Guitar Hero 5". Thought it should be added, but not sure where to put it or what to do about it. Cheers. 96.52.142.27 (talk) 10:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on In My Place. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]