Talk:Incitement to terrorism

A fact from Incitement to terrorism appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that some types of incitement to terrorism are constitutionally protected in the United States?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Incitement to terrorism.

Wikipedia

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that some types of incitement to terrorism are constitutionally protected in the United States? Source: Weinstein, James (2011). "An Overview of American Free Speech Doctrine". In Hare, Ivan; Weinstein, James (eds.). Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-172067-3.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Joanne Jordan (talent agent)

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 03:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Article is new enough and long enough (it was technically created May 15, not May 19, but still nominated within the required timeframe). No copyvio issues: the article relies heavily on quoted text, but everything is properly cited and indicated as such. Hook content has an inline citation, and I've confirmed that the source info supports it. The hook is short enough and definitely interesting, but I wonder: would it be more accurate to say that "some types" of incitement to terrorism are constitutionally protected, rather than "many types"? The article does not specify exactly how many types are protected. I also note that the nominator's QPQ is not quite complete (they queried an issue in their initial DYK review, and have not yet responded to the nom's changes). Alanna the Brave (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alanna the Brave: Thanks for the review. I have edited the hook as requested and have replied on the other nomination (Wikipedia:Did_you_know#QPQ actually does not say anything about follow up assuming the initial review is carried out correctly.) b uidhe 20:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Thanks Buidhe -- your DYK hook looks good to go now. I know the rules don't specify an obligatory QPQ followup, but I think it's good practice to follow through with a DYK review after you've initially queried an issue (otherwise, it just ends up adding to the backlog of unapproved noms). Cheers, Alanna the Brave (talk) 21:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]