Talk:Infection prevention and control

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nkremer1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial reference removed[edit]

I revised the section entitled "Surveillance for emerging infections" to eliminate a reference to a commercial product that is neither unique nor a standard within the field. Benjaloo 01:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prevention of Surgical Site infection[edit]

Hello THis is DR SB Kulkarni. Am an microbiologist and have worked in infection control especialy regarding prevention of Surgical Site infections. There is no mention of the topic on this page. Is there anyone out there who would like to share their experiences in infection control with me? Dr Sanjay Kulkarni

Topic Category suggestion[edit]

I have an interest in expanding the healthcare infection prevention and control sections of wikipedia. I would suggest that Infection Control-related pages be re-categorised as 'Healthcare infection prevention and control". Not as a sub-category under Epidemiology. Any thoughts from others? 58.105.146.22 (talk) 04:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be good to mention that surfaces should be disinfected because harmful bacteria can stay on surfaces even days after contact, increasing the chances of spreading the bacteria through person to person contact.

More CFR Part section for this topic ???[edit]

Have not got much time to screen all the 29 CFR Part 1910 for the topic, apart from 29 CFR Part 1910.1030. If there are more sections which covers this topic, please add them in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.190.54 (talk) 03:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

propose merge from Cross-infection control[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was merge into Infection control.

The new page (Cross-infection control) is essentially a synonym, and is not a term in wide use. The content there is minimal, and lacks reliable sources. I was tempted to suggest speedy deletion, but merge seemed worth proposing. -- Scray (talk) 22:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: I am the author of the stub above, I didnt spot the extensive infection control article in existence already! I suggest a merge and redirect Cross-infection control to this article. Ashley Payne (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agree. Go ahead, Scray, and merge the two; perhaps Ashley would like to edit the text "into" the article. Drmies (talk) 23:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge complete, hope I included all the key content. In the process I created some new content for Infection control, but it still needs a lot of fleshing out. -- Scray (talk) 02:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Infection control. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Infection control. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed Section on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis[edit]

It appears that this section has existed without references for quite some time. (with the citations needed tag being added in 2014) I would therefore formally Dispute the validity of the claim due to the fact that it appears that the body of evidence actually seems to suggest against it if anything, and will remove it within the next week, if proper references are not cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.178.54 (talk) 01:56, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with immediate removal of the content. USN007 (talk) 01:59, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Removed as proposed. This is definitely problematic to present without sources. bd2412 T 04:02, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that 71.91.178.54 is USN007. Luckily BD2412 is also stating an opinion for consensus rather than just just socks agreeing with themself. DMacks (talk) 00:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the vaccination section should be expanded on. Statistics or a table displaying statistics for the effectiveness of the vaccinations would benefit the section and article overall. Using stats would allow for the reader to better understand how the use of such prevention can work User:nkremer1 (User talk:nkremer1) 1:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Infection_prevention_and_control&oldid=1207714333"