Talk:Ingvar runestones

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Density[edit]

I realize that the casual browsing type is likely to look at this page, but even still it needs to be condensed and made more accessible.RSido 03:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think listing the runestones like this makes the runestones more accessible to the reader. It can of course be improved by providing images and more information on the individual runestones and/or making subpages. Each stone has a 1000 year old story and is often a real work of art.--Berig 07:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sö 173[edit]

Sö 173 is listed here and is also in the Viking runestones article at Sö 173. The inscription clearly refers to the Ingvar expedition and the Viking runestones article discusses this, so the Sö 173 section on the Viking runestones article should probably be deleted to avoid duplication and inconsistent information. Deanlaw (talk) 15:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Runes in Unicode[edit]

I wonder if it would be appropriate to write the original script, runes, in the article, when writing the stone content. For example the Gripsholm stone Sö 179 contains:

ᛏᚢᛚᛅ : ᛚᛁᛏ : ᚱᛅᛁᛋᛅ : ᛋᛏᛅᛁᚾ : ᚦᛁᚾᛋ ᛅᛏ : ᛋᚢᚾ : ᛋᛁᚾ : ᚼᛅᚱᛅᛚᛏ : ᛒᚱᚢᚦᚢᚱ : ᛁᚾᚴᚢᛅᚱᛋ : ᚦᛅᛁᛦ : ᚠᚢᚱᚢ : ᛏᚱᛁᚴᛁᛚᛅ : ᚠᛁᛅᚱᛁ : ᛅᛏ : ᚴᚢᛚᛁ : ᛅᚢᚴ : ᛅ:ᚢᛋᛏᛅᚱᛚᛅᚱ ᚾᛁ : ᚴᛅᚠᚢ : ᛏᚢᚢ : ᛋᚢᚾᛅᚱ:ᛚᛅ : ᛅᛋᛁᚱᚴ:ᛚᛅᚾ:ᛏᛁ

Some computers can't show this, instead showing squares only. But other can get runes, and readers can then compare them to the stone images. Can we include the runes with a note that some browsers can't display this correctly?--BIL (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ingvar runestones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]