Talk:Innovia APM 256

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Requested move 24 November 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOVED —UY Scuti ^Talk 05:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taipei Metro CITYFLO650 → Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 – CITYFLO 650 is a wrong name by mixing up the name of the control system and that of the rolling stock. Either Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 or Taipei Metro C370 is better and without ambiguity. SElephant (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)--SElephant (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest moving this to Taipei Metro Bombardier Innovia APM 256 and set up O'Hare ATS Bombardier Innovia APM 256 Sinsyuan (talk) 12:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Width

Why does it say 2.54 when its name is from being 2.56 m wide? I put a Citation Needed tag in case it is 2.54 m wide in reality rather than change it to 2.56 m. QuarioQuario54321 (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]