This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
the number of casualties given in the box is high and exaggerated, 5000-6000 Algerian killed would be a resounding victory, which the battle was not and it was a Spanish defeat, plus, ibn Ruqaya al Tlemceni, an eyewitness and a contemporary source at that time, record that 300 Algerians were killed in his book Al zahra nai'ra (الزهرة النائرة), would be more accurate.[https://ia803106.us.archive.org/30/items/zahranaira/zahra%20naira.pdf] page 153 عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@عبدالرحمن4132: there is a non-communicative IP that has been changing the numbers, drive-by tagging various related articles and edit warring (for which they were blocked last week). Unless the situation changes (they start explaining their edits or engaging in a discussion), their edits will be reverted on sight. M.Bitton (talk) 16:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
another thing is that the IP lists those citations as unreliable without giving a proper explanation as why they're wrong. the IP would also post uncited number in Algiers expedition (1541) that would be taken from Spanish Wikipedia which also has no citation, unless the IP provides a reason. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
