Talk:Inverse copular constructions
This is an interesting article. In particular, I'm enthused by the statement that inverse copular constructions present a challenge to the dogmatic binary subject-predicate division of the clause. It looks like someone named Semmelweiss originally drafted this article. Are you out there Semmelweiss? Or is anyone out there who knows who Semmelweiss is? I'd very much like to have an exchange with that person.
Concerning this article in particular, I may undertake to revise it. It has something important to say and I think that better organization with more examples that are presented in a clear way will make the content more accessible. --Tjo3ya (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2012 (UTC)