Talk:Islamophobia in the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Islam in the United Kingdom#Gunning|Gunning (2010)]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Josefhoracek, Klpoi5, Samantha O'Donnell, Ssledd1, Farzan Ikhlas, DefenderV, Cdunc2015, Tdao 1, Gjone34, Eshire1, Evig12, Marlena Holmes, Jerome1919, Alouisville7, Laursren, AleksandarTomic22, Oscarortiz1. Peer reviewers: DefenderV, Oscarortiz1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jmcardis.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the term "Islamophobia"

As with most articles on this subject, there may be attempts to change the title on the basis that many people do not view "Islamophobia" as a real thing or, at the very least, don't like the term "Islamophobia." Rather than getting into this debate personally on this talk page, please see previous conversations on the talk page for the main Islamophobia page such as this one and many prior that have determined Islamophobia to be sufficiently neutral for regular use on Wikipedia. Thanks. Kamalthebest (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Islamophobia in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715102515/http://www.politicsandreligionjournal.com/images/pdf_files/srpski/godina4_broj2/8%20chris%20allen%20vol.iv%20no.2.pdf to http://www.politicsandreligionjournal.com/images/pdf_files/srpski/godina4_broj2/8%20chris%20allen%20vol.iv%20no.2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the Tory party

See [1], an article this month. Doug Weller talk 10:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage is pretty widespread and has received a lot of response from Conservative politicians. It definitely deserves a mention on both here and the Conservative Party (UK) articles, perhaps the creation of a Islamophobia in the UK Conservative Party article may hold merit.

Jonjonjohny (talk) 10:29, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On Bias and its importance to British Islamophobia

User: CameronCampili With an article pertaining to a controversial topic such as islamophobia, it is easy to insert one's bias into their edits and content additions. British media coverage of the topic is ripe with extreme bias on both ends of the spectrum so its very easy to fall into that trap. To ensure that the content in this article is both unbiased and factual its important to merely state that facts of how islamophobia has played out in Britain and has effected the British Islamic community especially seeing as this is a hot topic between the Conservative and Labour parties respectively. Wikipedia is an essential resource for those attempting to gauge a better understanding of islamophobia making the utilizing of this unbiased approach crucial.

On the subject of Politics.

It seems obvious that the section on the conservative party is merited at this point, but there are reports of liberals being Islamophobic due to the view that Muslim culture is connected to an oppression of women. Link Wouldn't it be more neutral to report both cases even when the liberal side is much less widespread? Thanks - JMCardis 2019