Talk:Jackson Katz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I'm surprised to find this article under notability dispute. Tough Guise is one incommunicably important documentary; I'm proud of Jackson Katz for being bold enough to make it and I want to know more.

Please translate this side in German![edit]

AugspurgII (talk) 11:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jackson Katz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bystander moment[edit]

This is a film by Jackson Katz, seems to have been made in 2018. There seems to have been no substantial activity on this page since. 2016. JohnAugust (talk) 12:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent self-promotion[edit]

This is clearly not an encyclopaedic article but, rather, a piece of self-promotion.

Much biographical information to be expected in an encyclopaedia - personal life, background, childhood, etc. - is absent. The article reads like a cv for a job application or a publicity sheet.

At long as such promotional articles are easy to create and remain unregulated Wikipedia will be seen by many as a promotional vehicle for publicity seekers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.43.98 (talk) 05:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not self promotion, as all of the information was written by persons other than the subject of the article, is factual and citations are provided to verify the facts. As for childhood, personal life, etc., these are not germane to Dr. Katz's work in violence prevention and antisexism, which are the central subjects of the article and are therefore unnecessary to its accuracy or completeness. If you feel there is information missing, please provide it with verifiable citations. Wikipedia is and continues to be an accurate and reliable source of information, biased only toward truth and science.--DaKine (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]