Talk:Jacques Duphly

Composers Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Book 4

Isn't it perhaps a tad harsh to suggest that all of the Quatrieme Livre is half-hearted? La Pothoüin, for example, is beautiful - probably among the most tender pieces of Duphly's output. --Irishmaestro (talk) 18:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

This article was flagged for copyright concerns at Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2013_April_5. While I cannot see the entire source, a spot check of significant terms supports that complaint. Material seems to have been introduced to the article with this edit of 2009. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]