Talk:Jeff Blake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


Jeff Blake is not being sued by the SEC that is a fault statement no letigation has been done by the SEC. Its a civil law suit against triton and a few of there employee"s which jeff blake is one of those people who got caught up in the wash like many others have and most likely in the next 30 days will be dropped from the law suit so make sure who ever is posting this make sure they have there facts straight or there will be letigation implications ahead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbts11 (talkcontribs) 19:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

If the suit is dropped—and the dismissal reported reliably—then there may not need to be further mention of the litigation. However, if the most current source says he's a party in a civil suit, then that's what's in the article now. Do you have a source that says otherwise? —C.Fred (talk) 19:41, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
I have looked at the Statesman article and clarified that 1) there are multiple defendants, 2) Blake is one of several big names added as defendants, and 3) the suit was not for securities fraud but for breach of fiduciary duty. —C.Fred (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Looking at the docket of this case W.D.Tx. 10-cv-00028-JRN, it appears unlikely that the celebrity defendants will continue to be joined in this private litigation. As-is, this single line for "Post Athletic Career" is grossly undue weight. Should revisit this matter in September (although the suit may be continued again at that time). Cool Hand Luke 14:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)