Talk:Jenny Geddes

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Reformed Christianity Low‑importance

	Reformed Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cuttie-stool

According to Silverwhistle, Jenny Geddes threw a "creepie-stool", not a "cuttie-stool". Kaldari 22:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prebble agrees, and my dictionary defines that as a folding stool. ..dave souza, talk 10:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Churches and Covenants.

Correcting the errors and misconceptions about Scottish history in this encyclopedia is becoming a little like the labours of Hercules. Well, here we go again.

The Scottish Church at the outset of Charles' reign had a full EPISCOPALIAN structure, with bishops operating both at a parliamentary and a diocesan level. The form of service, however, was more free-form Calvinism, as opposed to the highly structured Anglican liturgy. It was Charles' intention to 'improve' the plain Scottish practice with a more formal system. The Prayer Book, which was to be part of this process, was compiled, on royal instuctions, by a panel of Scottish bishops. Laud had no hand in this. The National Covenant was drawn up to challenge liturgical innovations, introduced without consent or approval. It makes no mention of bishops. These gentlemen were finally ejected from the Church by the General Assembly, held in Glasgow in November 1638. From this point, and only from this point, the Church of Scotland became fully Presbyterian.

The reference to the Covenanters 'seizing the city of Aberdeen' is misleadingly out of place. Why would they seize a city already in Scotland? It was indeed taken from local royalist forces, but only after the outbreak of the First Bishops' War in 1639.

For a fuller discussion of this subject see 'Charles, Scots and Bishops' in the talk page of the English Civil War. Rcpaterson 01:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Translation

"Devil cause you severe pain and flatulent distention of your abdomen, false thief: dare you say the Mass in my ear?" is very humorously literal, but rather longwinded, and I suspect that the redoubtable Mrs. Geddes meant to say 'flatulent distention of your abdomen' but rather something far more succinct. So do you suppose that the translation could be done slightly more loosely to more reflect what she wanted to say? 70.16.8.52 04:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Flatulent distention...." is one of the definitions of Colic... but there are multiple types. As colic is still in use, and we ALL know how unhappy babies are when we have it.... perhaps no one needs to turn the perfectly clear word into something else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.148.251.0 (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you might know but it's not that clear to me, and since the term's already in the original, I've used "severe pains" with a piped link to colic, and "in the abdomen" as that's what wame means. Less colourful than the full description, but more concise. . dave souza, talk 18:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the word 'reverend'

'Reverend' as applied to a clergyman acts as an adjective, it is not a noun, such as 'Doctor'. As it is used as a description of a person, it is not used with the surmane alone. Thus 'The Reverend Foster' is incorrect - 'The Reverend M Foster' or 'The Reverend Michael Foster' is correct. The use of the word 'reverend' on its own as applied to a clergyman is a colloquialism of speech, and unless it is reported speech, is out of place in an enclopedia article. Osjknights (talk) 11:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jenny Geddes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041016160919/http://www.fpcr.org/blue_banner_articles/jgeddes.htm to http://www.fpcr.org/blue_banner_articles/jgeddes.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]