Talk:Jill Stein 2016 presidential campaign

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jill Stein 2016 presidential campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

Page move request

Resolved

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Want to move this to Jill Stein presidential campaign, 2016 but page already exists

I've moved the page for you to the correct location. Nick (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

platform

I see that someone has copied her platform from her campaign website twice and both times its been wiped as per wp:copyvio. Surely though to copy from a website that has the sole purpose of getting her message out this is a time when it would be ok to copy? Eleutherius (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

biography page / 2016 platform

Jill Stein's biography page has a number of issues from her platform that would perhaps be better suited to this page. (This has often been the consensus view for removing text from the biography page.) However, no context has yet been made with those who have worked on this page. I doubt that those focused on the recent smear campaign on vaccines and GMOs will seek to radically change this page (because the average Wikipedia user probably is happy to just look at the main biography page to get an idea of the candidate); but I thought that it would be helpful to point out that there is still a significant amount of material on the bio page that would probably be more appropriate here (as some who have also worked on this page have suggested). This morning I removed the systemic anti-Stein bias tag I had added to the bio page about a week ago. Though many may feel there are still biased (generally anti-Stein) statements on the page (as I do), I think it would be a mistake to continue to identify the page as anti-Stein, now that the gorilla comparison and other misleading statements have been removed. SashiRolls (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ballot status

Why is the ballot status from previous elections included? Jill Stein was not even the candidate in 2008 and 2004. It is frankly irrelevant and belongs in the articles about previous campaigns. I will remove these unless someone has a good counterargument. 75.51.198.63 (talk) 08:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The relevance is frankly obvious: it makes explicit the progress the Green candidate makes in becoming elegible for the American voters. So please keep it there.Otto (talk) 13:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But this article is only about the 2016 campaign, information about the historical progress of ballot status should go on the main Green Party page. I don't think it's relevant to have Information about the Green Party ballot status in 2004 with a different candidate. I agree with the removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:4011:1800:0:0:0:0:B (talk) 19:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it should be removed; as others have said the information is irrelevant to the specific campaign. It belongs elsewhere. 75.172.223.49 (talk) 08:25, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]