Talk:John Frazer (architect)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal John Frazer (architect) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Early removal?

This just seems to be the subject himself uploading sections from his CV. A case for early removeal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbott42 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. A good case for trimming, possibly down to a stub if needed, in order to make the article fit a neutral point of view. For notability the criteria is defined by WP:Notability (academics) and John Frazer meets those criteria, so I would not be in a rush to delete, only encourage improvement. --Fæ (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]