Talk:Joseph C. Wilson

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joseph C. Wilson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of California

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 (July 2005–Nov 2009)

Overhaul of article

I am a fairly new Wikipedia editor, and am probably rushing in where angels fear to tread. But I believe the main article could benefit from some tightening. From an NPOV standpoint, I am particularly concerned about the phenomenon of citation to editorials, presented as if these were reportage rather than opinion, usually for quite pejorative statements about the subject (that he is a nobody, a blowhard, etc). I also question the amount of space devoted to allegations made in WorldnetDaily, and wonder if this is an appropriately mainstream and factual source for Wikipedia. (I note that there is substantial support among senior Wikipedia people for the proposition that it is not.) Finally, the article is over-long and the chronology confusing ("Plamegate" is mentioned several paragraphs before the visit to Niger, though it happened after). I propose an overhaul which will shorten the article, and fix the chronology, while respecting NPOV standards. I will go section by section, and propose each specific change I want to make here before proceeding. Oh, and by the way, I will review the archived discussion to make sure I don't reinvent the wheel. Jonathanwallace (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I followed you here from Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests. Interesting biography of a living person with a wiki article that has had no edits since 2005, but hundreds of edits before that date. Very unusual in my (short) wiki experience :-) Ottawahitech (talk) 21:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I feel like Mr. Jones in the Dylan song (there's something happening here but I don't know what it is). I also posted a request for clarification on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard Jonathanwallace (talk) 22:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First edit

I just changed the title of the "Plamegate" section to "Disclosure of Valerie Plame Identity". I have found Wikipedia guidance that "-gate" is a disfavored formulation, and in fact I don't find that the occurrence is routinely referred to as "Plamegate" in media anyway. I am reading the archive to make sure I don't reinvent any wheels. Philosophically, I will approach editing this page with extreme caution, doing two things that are not required by Wikipedia policy: 1. I will announce any change I am about to make here, then wait a decent interval; 2. although I believe there is matter worthy of deletion in the article under Wikipedia source rules and weight policies, I will reorganize and restructure, and where appropriate add content, rather than deleting anything on a first pass. I would ask anyone who disagrees to engage me in discussion here, rather than reverting any changes after they are made. I look forward to working together. Jonathanwallace (talk) 03:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology and other edits

I have now read the whole archived discussion thread. I am very eager to avoid similar edit wars and mutually assured reversions, so again commit to discussing the specifics of any change here, and ask anyone who disagrees to set forth their thoughts in response. First thing I want to do is reorganize the chronology of the piece, which is confusing. I will move the discussion of the Valerie Plame disclosures after that of the Niger trip. I will probably group all career details first, then the Niger trip, then the Plame disclsoure, then the book, lawsuit, etc. After these factual/biographical sections, I will stick close to the existing structure of opinions, other media disputes, etc. I am not proposing to delete any material, but would like to streamline or summarize some of the extensive quoting from editorials, which I think is overlong, dull and confusing. There may also be some material in the more straightforwardly biographical sections which can be appropriately moved down to the opinion sections. However, before I do anything along these lines, I will post something here about the specific edits I want to make. Jonathanwallace (talk) 15:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revised

I just substantially overhauled the article to accomplish the follwing: 1. Reorganize sections to place them in chronological order; 2. Eliminate redundant material which was inserted due to the heavy, patchwork editing that occurred as the events unfolded; 3. Move information from "Commentary" and "controversies" sections to factual sections above, as appropriate; 4. Streamline a lot of the overly detailed "on the one hand, on the other" stuff and the "he's a hero/he's a goat" repetition; 5. review and edit the article from the perspective of NPOV, weight, and readability concerns; 6. where appropriate, preserve brief mention of certain issues in the article while moving overly intricate detail into the footnotes; 7. eliminate a certain amount of original research and synthesis, and partisan-cruft on both sides of the issue. In general, I have tried to transform this into an article which can be read in five or ten years as an encyclopedic overview, rather than a highly confusing snapshot of a energetic debate of the mid-2000's. This is a work in progress, and I will be back regularly to keep improving it. Other eyes and edits to achieve these goals are quite welcome. The original article is preserved in my user space for comparison. Jonathanwallace (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Reference

wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. So why is http://u-r-next.com/wilsonBio.htm an source???? http://u-r-next.com I think the person who wrote this is not that interrested in facts.. --188.107.125.251 (talk) 19:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Joseph C. Wilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joseph C. Wilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Joseph C. Wilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for photo?

There's already a photo … so I've removed the request for a photo, as it is obviously not needed. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 09:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]