Jump to content

Talk:Firman of Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

Untitled

[edit]

The firman of 13 May 1277 quoted in this article is suspect. The date is plausible, but the reference to “parliament” is anachronistic. Can we find a more authoritative source for the quote? Aramgar 13:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that in his capacity as the vezir to the pretender Jimri, Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey instituted the use of the Turkish language in the chancellory; but this anachronistic quote must be sourced or removed. Aramgar (talk) 03:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Language???

[edit]

how is it possible to use a language that majority cannot speak? It was not Turkish but Oguz(as the speakers name their language and nation) and until Mehmet II of ottomans brought some uighur translators from bukhara almost no one was able to speak Turkish, what today we call Chagatay Turkish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.176.216 (talk) 10:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Above remark is groundless. Oghuz is a branch of Turkic, just as Uighur. Mehmet bey did not impose a language. (By the way he was controlling only a small portion of Turkey and he didn't live long after his firman) People in Turkey was already speaking Turkish and his firman had nothing to do with the native language. He only tried to regulate the palace language which was Persian. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Kimdir

[edit]

Kim Kimdir is not reliable source. Takabeg (talk) 23:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

We have to note there are many Mehmed Beg/Beys in Anatolian Principalities. Results includes other Mehmed Beg/Beys.

These results includes other Karamanid Mehmed Beg (Mehmet II of Karaman[citation needed])... Takabeg (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Takabeg (talk) 03:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karamanoglu.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Karamanoglu.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title and text

[edit]

The title of this article is about a person. But the content is about language . I think the title should be moved to more appropriate name or else the text should be rewritten. I'll try to reach the contributers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Firman of Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]