Talk:Karen Fann

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Advertisement for Her Business[edit]

The article states that the business is "very successful," but cites only a campaign website in support of that statement. If the matter is to be discussed in an encyclopedia, it should be done in the context whether the President of Arizona Senate having an interest in a business that provides road signage is a permissible conflict of interest.174.17.137.81 (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism by IP editor[edit]

(Snooganssnoogans talk), (Therequiembellishere talk), (SuperHamster talk), (PohranicniStraze talk) IP Editor 172.58.222.238, probably located in the Worcester-Boston, Massachusetts area, vandalized this article, completely and repeatedly reversing five substantial identical restoration edits by four long-time editors within six hours. The only prior WP edits from that IP address were to the article on former Devin Nunes and Trump administration staffer Kash Patel on January 9th, and I think probably not done by the same person. Can this page be protected? Activist (talk) 22:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing out and deleting deliberate bias partisan wording is not vandalism no matter how many temper tantrums you throw.172.58.223.64 (talk) 14:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The wording/diction is truly sub-par. "false claim" seriously? To any sophisticated reader, using the term "false claim" in the lede instantly signals that this not a legitimate article. And that Wikipedia is not a serious knowledge project. Need to do better. Worse, they use CNN as if it's a valid primary source. LAWL

I'm of the opinion that, while Snooganssnoogans' edits were made with some bias, the vast majority of them are made with good intentions towards maintaining neutrality. If you want to edit the article to further support neutrality(Or to bias it conservative), don't make statements like "These statements have no basis in fact," rather, go "X Source claims these allegations to be false" and cite it.RosaBrabaria (talk) 00:47, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question of veracity[edit]

This statement is in the second paragraph: 'The audit is widely seen as an illegitimate "effort to undermine valid election results."' I question how this can be proven. How things are "seen" is highly subjective. I suggest we delete this sentence and stick with facts, not subjective, unverifiable claims.

Yates (talk) 01:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]