Talk:Keating–Owen Act
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Keating–Owen Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move to Wikitext
[edit]Surely the US government has places to search for old legislation, and they need not be repeated here on Wikipedia? --Wtshymanski 16:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't know how to do this, but this article should show up when people search for Wick's Bill
Needs edits
[edit]"and any facility where children under two worked at night or more than 48 hours daily" does not make sense. Something is obviously off and needs to be edited. I have no experience editing so I'll leave it to others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C2:201:C189:20AB:DDD2:676F:464C (talk) 02:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Wording
[edit]"Anyone found in acceptance of this Act or who gave false evidence would be subject to fines and/or imprisonment."
I'm no lawyer and don't understand Lawspeak but surely that should read "in violation of this Act", no? Beetfarm Louie (talk) 09:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Start-Class organized labour articles
- Unknown-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles