Talk:Kenneth Mejia
This article was nominated for deletion on April 6, 2017. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
2021 party switch
[edit]There doesn't seem to be a source for the claim that Mejia switched from the Green Party back to the Democratic Party. How was this conclusion reached? DominateEye (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I linked a source to the infobox that seems to justify that claim, although the years of affiliation could have better sources
- Zaelzo (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
CPA status
[edit]I added a sentence about Mejia's CPA status based on an LA Mag article. It was removed by someone who appears to be affiliated with the Mejia campaign. Their edit summary contests the dates of the claim, but not its overall veracity. No opposing evidence was presented. I am not sure what would be appropriate in this situation... perhaps a more general claim along the lines of "Mejia's CPA designation did not have 'active' status in the period leading up to January 2022." I am curious what others think.
Zaelzo (talk) 06:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Well, they were right that prior to 2018 it was expired for just 10 days according to LA Mag (November 30, 2016 to December 9, 2016 – Expired, then OK until 2018). I put it back in and placed the start at November 2018 from which it was continuously expired/inactive. --StellarNerd (talk) 06:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- @StellarNerd Ohh ok that makes sense, I didn't realize. Thanks! Zaelzo (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- It was easy to overlook, if you just looked at the beginning and end date of the entire block it could look like something 2016-2022. --StellarNerd (talk) 19:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- @StellarNerd Ohh ok that makes sense, I didn't realize. Thanks! Zaelzo (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Start-Class Los Angeles articles
- Unknown-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Asian Americans articles
- Unknown-importance Asian Americans articles
- WikiProject Asian Americans articles
- WikiProject United States articles