Jump to content

Talk:KiloWatts (musician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because of association with established record labels and artists, most of whom are linked within the page.

This article also meets the following criteria for notability:

  • Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
  • Has released two or more albums on a major label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are notable).

KiloWatts & Vanek have released on Dependent Records, Motor Music, and Diffusion Records.[12] [13] [14]

  • Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles.

Bluetech and KiloWatts are together part of Invisible Allies.[15] Tanner Ross & KiloWatts form Voodeux, on Mothership Music, a label run by Claude VonStroke.[16]

  • Is cited in reliable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching in a particular music genre.

Invisible Allies project rated as Best Of 2010 by Headphone Commute.[17]

  • Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture. [18] [19] [20] [21]

References

[edit]
Lunchable1 (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I removed the speedy because of your contested deletion argument. Please do add the remaining sources mentioned here that haven't been already mentioned in the article and support the assertions of notability as much as possible. (preferably ones that aren't reviews or blogposts). AngelOfSadness talk 00:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here's some more sources that might be helpful for the article: 123 (It's in German but I speak German so I can translate parts for you that Google translate can't deal with just let me know if you need help with this one:))4. AngelOfSadness talk 01:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KiloWatts (musician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
There are six entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
  • WP:ELCITE: access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section. -- Otr500 (talk) 21:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]