Talk:Kjell & Company

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Sweden

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I removed the promotespeak from the article, leaving it very short. I've now learned that the chain is significant and well-known in peripherals-buying circles—a neutral person I spoke with even called it "a skånsk Clas Ohlson"—I'm sorry if I seemed to doubt it in previous edit summaries! I'm restoring the stub template, as the article can certainly stand informational expansion, though the overly advertising type of sentence that I removed should not be used. Bishonen | talk 07:55, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It needs sources to verify that it is significant though. It hasn't had any other than its own website since the article was created many years ago. Churchgoer251 (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasted from Wikipedia:Swedish_Wikipedians'_notice_board#Possible_candidates_for_deletion

KjellFakta is obviously advertising, but what about Kjell & Company? Is this chain significant enough to have an article. It claims to have 12 stores, mostly in Southern Sweden. Uppland 07:02, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Tups, yes, I think it is significant enough. I removed the promotespeak from the article, with somewhat impatient edit summaries which I now regret, as a neutral third party (in fact my nerdy kid) has told me they're high profile in his (=peripherals-buying) circles. And we don't even live in the south! I quote: "You don't know Kjell & Company? But they're like a skånsk Clas Ohlson! And they just opened a big store in Stockholm!" He'd even heard of KjellFakta. (Hey, Clas Ohlson a redlink? Shame!) Bishonen | talk 07:45, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yup, Clas Ohlson AB should have an article. As for Kjell, sometimes these, um, corporate contributors (trying very hard to avoid the word "spammers"...) do themselves harm by producing ad-copy, which risks getting deleted, when we would be perfectly happy with a factual article on the company and its history. And nobody would ever suspect vanity if it was written that way. Uppland 08:24, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Herman.jpg

Image:Herman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]