Talk:Koitajoki

Russia: Physical geography Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Koita River

There seems to be no proper reference to the usage of a term "Koita River". While the Swedish company Vattenfall on its website uniquely uses the term "Lower-Koita River", this clearly (a) is not the same term and not a valid reference "Koita River", (b) refers to another concept (the lower part of Koitajoki), (c) in itself seems to be bad English (to me, by the hyphenation), indicating it does not represent a relevant authority of English language. Koitajoki is the term in English text produced by those knowledgeable of Finnish geography (which I believe Vattenfall is not, but this is prejudice). Sorry about arguing of these again. --Martenz (talk) 22:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The English language has many intricacies, just as Finnish does. WP:HYPHEN provides an overview of [many] ways in which hyphens are used within English. For the given example of "Lower-Koita River", the hyphen serves to separate the adjective from the name, in order to prevent ambiguity: "(Lower Koita) (River)" verses "(Lower)-(Koita River)"; English tends to avoid making up compounds. —Sladen (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not done Skomorokh 17:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Koitajoki → Koita River — WP:ENGLISH. Similar case to discussion surrounding the move of Kollasjoki to Kollaa River. Page was moved from english name, without discussion, in December 09. - Relisting Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

—Labattblueboy (talk) 06:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Koitajoki seems well enough used in English. I'd need decent evidence that "Koita River" is more commonly used. Knepflerle (talk) 04:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.