This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
The dish is independently notable, and that article was around for three years longer than this one. I can't tell how similar they are, but if material was copied it was from there to here. The convention on Wikipedia is to have articles about forms of cuisine, separate articles about notable dishes, and yet other articles about establishments that serve the cuisine. It's somewhat arbitrary to consider Korean tacos part of a trend in Korean-Mexican cuisine (actually, Korean-Mexican-American street food). Just glancing at the menus of the places involved, and some of the sources, it looks like the instigator, Kogi Korean BBQ, is doing mostly Mexican fusion, but others are adopting that dish as part of Japanese or pan-Asian fusion, or Mexican fusion, e.g. http://streetfood.namusf.com/menu.html. Perhaps the subject of the cuisine article is not notable enough to stand alone as an article apart from its content on tacos and on the establishments involved. If it is notable, and too much detail was imported from a child article, it can be culled. - Wikidemon (talk) 21:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with merging. We own a Korean Mexican restaurant and "korean taco" is not the name of any dish, nor do I think it's independently notable - there is no real such thing as [a] korean taco; and korean tacoS are really Korean-Mexican fusion tacos. Korean Taco is likely the name an individual restaurant gave to something. As an example, a "kalbi taco" or "bulgogi taco" would reference the filling. "Korean Taco" is about as descriptive/appropriate as "American Pizza". The cuisine has advanced in the last 19 years far beyond "korean taco" and the original article's content is better left in the larger topic. Also, as the main Korean-Mexican fusion article references several other restaurants, we were trying to include a mention of ours, as we are the first restaurant to expand to China and to a population that doesn't know Koreans or LA or food trucks, which we feel is relevant to the article's content. At the same time we want to be respectful to the community and to the balance of the article. Its not our intention to spam and we are frustrated it keeps getting deleted. Any guidance would be appreciated, I'm relatively new on here.. --Krystjan1 (talk) 10:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The "Korean taco" has enough legs to stand on its own by this time. See, for example this 2015 BBC story. It is arguably the first of modern Korean-Mexican cuisine fusion items. I'd argue for a merger the other way, with "Korean-Mexican fusion" being merged into "Korean taco," but I think they might as well remain as separate articles. Not that each could not use further work and expansion, you understand. Geoff | Who, me?15:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]