Talk:Kupres

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Bosnia and Herzegovina High‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Kupres is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 11 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No prejudice against further discussion about Joy's suggestion though. Jenks24 (talk) 17:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kupres, Canton 10 → Kupres – This page is the primary topic for "Kupres". There are two municipalities named "Kupres" (one in Federation and one in Republika Srpska), but this one is much larger and contains the city of Kupres. "Kupres" already redirects to this page (which means that this is the primary topic). Vanjagenije (talk) 12:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - page view statistics show no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 02:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any book source will be talking about the town as Kupres, meaning that it is the natural primary topic, having been a gazetteer item for many centuries, as opposed to 20 years for the administrative divisions of modern .ba. So, to avoid any confusion, we could simply split both municipalities into their own articles and just have the town article at Kupres, and everything would be orderly. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - given that the redirect is already 'Kupres', the rename seems obvious. There also some improbable redirects such as Kupres (Kupres). Pincrete (talk) 22:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kupres. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110721100437/http://www.hrv.hr/newportal/vijesti/vijest.php?clanak=13771 to http://www.hrv.hr/newportal/vijesti/vijest.php?clanak=13771

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]