Talk:Lad lit

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 18 April 2016 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 5 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Lad lit (genre) to Lad lit. The result of the discussion was moved.

Is lad lit real or not?

The article starts with this sentence:

Lad lit is a fictional genre of male-authored novels about young men and their emotional and personal lives, often characterized by a confessional and humorous writing style.

So, is lad lit fictional or real? – Tea2min (talk) 06:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lad lit (genre) → Lad lit – The is required to comply with articling titling policy, specifically MOS:PRECISION. The word "genre" in brackets is overprecise - disambiguation is not required. Also its important to be consistent with other articles - chick lit, lad mag, etc which do not have a similar disambiguation Atrapalhado (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator. Needless disambiguation. JIP | Talk 13:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.