Talk:Languages of Argentina

Languages High‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Argentina High‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Languages of Argentina, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on February 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 10 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MartBuck.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

Theres lots of additional information on the Ethnologue page on Argentina and the subpages for individual languages, some of which do not have direct links and you have to do a search on them specifically. Furthermore there is a LOT of information and content on the Spanish version of this article.Qrc2006 00:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC) m — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C67:6D80:245:61DE:9877:7E44:648D (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WPCD

I would like to nominate this article for the WPCD, any one second that?Qrc2006 23:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

InterWiki

It is inappropriate for the right-hand side of this article to be overrun with {{InterWiki}} templates. I've removed them. Melchoir 03:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German

I believe that the swissinfo 1.8 million figure sounds like too much, and the source is just taken from a comment by a Martin Jebsen (after all, its an economics related article).

There are very different sourced numbers of German speakers in Argentina. Because of this, we should preferably say between X and Y German speakers citing both the lowest and highest figures. It would be not only more correct, but would also let the reader know that such an uncertanty exists. --Mariano(t/c) 14:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly Mariano. German is heard very often in Argentina. It is used very often in Bussiness so this would be a very good source because of that. Don't be bias because it sounds like you are. (XGustaX 14:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Your line of reasoning left behind the most important part of my message: more than one linguistic-related source claim that there are less than half of the German speakers the SwissInfo article suggests. We cannot just ignore this fact.

My comment on the number of German Speakers been too high has its root on the figures that state there are around 1.5 million Italian speakers; thus some 300,000 less than German speakers, what seams to me incoherent given the number of Italian immigrants compared to that of the Germans, and the similarities of the Italian language with Spanish.

Again, it's not my opinion on the number of German speakers, its about the incoherence in numbers between the sources; Why choose the SwissInfo over the ethnologue or WorldLanguage ?? Doing so consist on Bias; commenting the incompatibility of the sources is not.

By the way, comments like "Don't be bias because it sounds like you are.", specially from a user who has used sockpuppets to push his point of view, are unnecessarily aggressive, since I came to the talk page to settle the issue before doing any modifications to the article. --Mariano(t/c) 15:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be talking when you are also agressively pressing your point of view. That is what I mean. In any ways the Italian speakers is wayyy to low you are right. I have found most sources that say the Italian speaking population is 6,9 precent. So you are right. Just because two sources say they are low doesnt mean they are right because they could be citing the same qoute. In any ways it German is heard often in Argentina and you should know this.It is deff. more the Arabic. Comon that I don't believe that what so ever. Arabic in deed is rare to hear, but the article says there are 1,000,000 speakers?. I can tell you that much. However, you are right I believe that there are many many more Italian speakers then 1,500,000 and 1,000,000 Arabic Speakers. No no, there is no way there are that many Arabic speakers especially since Arabs came in realtively small numbers to Argentina. The italian figure sounds too low to me especially when 60 precent of Argentines are of Italian descent. The source tho seems creditable. The fact of the matter is German is a very common language to hear in Argentina and 500,000 sounds too small. Especially when business use it often also. You are right you came to talk page first which is good, however It seems like all you do is like to revert peoples edits and thats why I felt that you were being bias. I am sorry if I was ""attacking you"", but then again talking about my pervious actions on wikipedia doesn't help either. Let's try to be civil here. Thank You.(XGustaX 20:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Again, since different sources give very different numbers, I suggest we rephrase such cases as "There are between X and Y numberos of Z speakers", sourcing bouth figures. It seams to be the only way to avoid judging a source better than the other. --Mariano(t/c) 20:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Normally your right I would not trust such sources normally, as you pointed out, but since German is a language heavly used in Business also, I would guess that businessmen would know there numbers (or have to know). I changed the article to reflect the changes we discussed. Good chatting with you.(XGustaX 16:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Variety

Arg. spanish clearly not a "castellano" variety, considering arg. isn't in north-central spain. changed it to the more fitting "bajeno" tho i realize some parts of the country are altenos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.66.66.52 (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other Languages

How many French speakers there are in Argentina? And English speakers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.16.224.125 (talk) 13:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC) There is a considerable Armenian diaspora in Argentina, many of whom speak Armenian. Information on this would add to the article.[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Languages of Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160221215704/http://www.indec.mecon.ar/ to http://www.indec.mecon.ar/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Languages of Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66QtRMrO0?url=http://www10.gencat.net/pres_casa_llengues/AppJava/frontend/llengues_detall.jsp?id=681 to http://www10.gencat.net/pres_casa_llengues/AppJava/frontend/llengues_detall.jsp?id=681&idioma=5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

missing data

less than 100 people speak english? that's not even logical. Nickjbor (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most Recent Additions

New information added based on the Spanish article that corresponds to this one, entitled "Lenguas de Argentina." *I am a student that is translating this for class and all translation was done to the best of my knowledge/abilities.--MartBuck (talk) 01:56, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Marty Buck[reply]

Creoyle -- under Quechuan languages

Quote: The smallest calculation of talks about a minimum of 60,000 speakers in 2000.[17] Its speakers are currently composed of a Creoyle population that does not self-recognize as indigenous (even though it admits an indigenous past).[18]
'The smallest calculation of talks' needs rephrasing. Can this group of people -- Creole, in English -- be discussed further, a reference maybe to this subsection of the Criollo people https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criollo_people&action=edit&section=4
Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hispanic_America&action=edit&section=5
--Brenont (talk) 01:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]