Jump to content

Talk:Latina, Lazio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus, page remains in place. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 20:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Latina, ItalyLatina (city) — It was the original title, it could be clearer and, as seen, it is the most used standard for italian "ambiguous" municipalities, ambiguos with "not municipal meanings". Thank you DerBorg (talk) 22:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


  • Oppose Latina, Italy is a much better disambiguation then Latina (city). TJ Spyke 23:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: in my opinion Latina should either be a disambiguation page or point directly to this article. I don't think the use of "Latina" as feminine for "Latino" is the least-surprise result for someone typing in the article's name, while the city would be. --LjL (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the references that have recently been added after making Latina a two-hops disambiguation page? Well, I'm not sure I'd trust a dictionary on this, dictionaries simply won't list cities in many cases; I'd rather have Google hits. Ironically, the first link (dictionary.com), when typing in "Latina" (not "Latino" as the reference has) does indeed give me the definition mentioned, but also provides me with ad banners about the city of Latina... ;-) Anyway, when I Google for "Latina", I get Wikipedia links first, then a politics site (apparently), then three official sites about the city of Latina in Italy. --LjL (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think Latino is the more likely search target than the town. Try searching "Latina" in Google and see how many results are about the town. (WP:GOOGLEHITS, I know, but that's just an example.) Jafeluv (talk) 18:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the latter, and I have changed it. --LjL (talk) 20:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Climate figures

[edit]

At the moment the table creates a huge gap of white space. I presume someone - whenever - will be filling in additional text in the article. So, I'm leaving it for the nonce but if no expansion were going to occur the page would have to be redesigned.Dave (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Latina, Lazio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]