Talk:Lego Ninja

Lego Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Deletion Proposal[edit]

I think this article should be deleted because:

The grammar is atrocious.
It is a sub-theme of castle so it should be on the LEGO Castle article.

Merge Proposal[edit]

I think the article LEGO Ninja should be merged with LEGO Castle because LEGO Ninja is a sub-theme of LEGO Castle.

LEGO Ninja is not part of LEGO Castle theme. It was a theme on its own. Even is stated and show in the LEGO book. GoTLG (talk) 11:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unique Article[edit]

I think that now that the Ninja theme was re-visited as the Ninjago, it seems to make more sense to keep it as a unique article, especially since as to right now, there has been no reference made that Ninjago has any connections to the Kingdoms series. Sgetz (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh according to Brickset, the original Ninja theme is a sub-theme of Lego Castle and Ninjago is its own stand alone theme. So in my opinion Ninja and Ninjago should be split into two seperate articles, with maybe a passing mention on Lego Ninja about the Ninjago theme. Salavat (talk) 15:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Or if according to User:GoTLG the original Lego Ninja might be a stand alone from Lego Castle. Even so here is some a couple of reviews that may help build a Lego Ninjago article. Note: Suite101 is on the Wikiblacklist hence the nowiki style:

Ninja Training Outpost, Set #2516 Review http://www.suite101.com/content/ninja-training-outpost-set-2516-a-lego-ninjago-review-a330876
Ninja Ambush, Set #2258 Review http://www.suite101.com/content/ninja-ambush-set-2258-a-lego-ninjago-review-a330872 at Suite101
Ice Dragon Attack, Set #2260 Review] at Suite101 http://www.suite101.com/content/ice-dragon-attack-set-2260-a-lego-ninjago-review-a330867
Ninjago Promo Giveaway, Set #4636204 Review http://www.suite101.com/content/ninjago-promo-giveaway-set-4636204-a-lego-review--preview-a324506 at Suite101
Of ninjas, plastic weapons and print at Wausau Daily Herald
LEGO® Ninjago Spins Onto Shelves at PRNewswire

Salavat (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page too short[edit]

This page is not long enough and should be worked on.It needs to have more information. CoolCDST (talk) 06:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a thought, why not add to it yourself?

More information added - why was the list of sets removed in the first place? Did nobody catch the vandalism by Drmies? 173.209.103.160 (talk) 19:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it wasn't vandalism. See WP:VANDAL. You can get all this trivia from Brickset, linked at the bottom of the article. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 19:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]