Talk:Liancourt Rocks dispute
Appearance
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liancourt Rocks dispute article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Too long
[edit]This article quickly devolves into minutiae as both sides keep adding more and more trivia to support their cause. 90.196.142.126 (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a bit too long. Any trimming has to be carefully done. Masterhatch (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- C-Class Korea-related articles
- High-importance Korea-related articles
- Unstable Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea articles