This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
Liber Figurarum is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
I will accept this, because I feel like the codex in question is almost certainly notable. However, the sources cited establish this, at best, indirectly: refs 1 and 2 (which are in any case the same) as well as 4 seem to be reviews of books commenting on / analysing the codex, and while those books would contribute to the notability of the codex, reviews thereof are once more removed from the subject. Meanwhile ref 5 is merely a digital copy of the codex, which does nothing to establish notability. Ref 3 is probably the best of the lot, but alone not sufficient. All that being said, I will accept this, because the existence of the reviews mentioned implies notability, even if it hasn't been properly demonstrated here. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually not "a codex" - you'll notice the article contains information on three different codices at least. The text is certainly notable, but that's not quite what this article is about. -- asilvering (talk) 06:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I salute you for the wiktionary attempt, but I think this is an Italian-to-English error for "decorated with miniatures". Though it is true that the image in the article is also red. -- asilvering (talk) 06:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]