Talk:Liberhan Commission

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename or move[edit]

Can someone please rename or move the page to "Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry" which is the official name as per the official notification of the Indian Government? Also, the judge's name is Manmohan Singh Liberhan - it currently refers to "M S Liberhan", so that might need to be changed too —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.90.69.13 (talk) 02:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tabled?[edit]

" The Government tabled the report and the accompanying action taken report (ATR)—which mostly contained recommendations—until 22 December, 2009" Isn't this using the American English meaning of tabled instead of the British English one would expect in India? Rmhermen (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence was awkwardly worded in any case. I have reworded it to "Parliament delayed discussion of the report and the accompanying Action Taken Report (ATR), which contained mostly recommendations, until 22 December 2009". NW (Talk) 22:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Context[edit]

This needs some context for those not intimately familiar with Indian politics.

  • Introduction
    • Why is this mosque disputed?
    • Why was it destroyed?
    • By whom?
    • What makes its destruction important?
    • From 3 months to 17 years is an astonishing overrun; an overrun like that begs for an explanation.
  • Terms
    • Needs linking, and is this a quote? If it isn't quoting, then the verbiage needs to be seriously cleaned up - expressions like 'all the facts and circumstances relating to' impede understanding.
  • Duration
    • What's 8 crore in USD?
    • Why does it seem to repeat the introduction?
    • Sequence of sentences is off - history, then outcomes, then history, then goals?
  • Leaked
    • What exactly is the report? A specific document of X hundred pages, like the 9/11 Report?
    • Was the report finished or were people being given drafts?
    • Why now?
    • What is the significance of the BJP and why would the report accusing them be seen as aiding the current government?
    • Ditto for RSS

External links

    • Official, or unofficial?
    • If official, then why the uproar about the leak?

Are the three links pointing to the same thing, or what?

Hope this review helps. --Gwern (contribs) 23:05 24 November 2009 (GMT)

The many extensions[edit]

From the article. I removed this part in my cleanup, but it still could be useful information if done properly:


March 31, 2009

March 31, 2009: The tenure of Liberhan Commission investigating in Ayodhya Babri Masjid Demolition Case was extended today for more three months till June 30, 2009. This extension in commission's tenure is 48th extension. Now commission is supposed to produce its report by June 30, 2009. This makes clear that commission will submit its report to new government after the General Elections

The original three months of the commission has been extended several times.

2008

1 May 2008: 45th Extension[1]

29 February:

2007

The Centre on Monday extended by another two months the tenure of the Justice Liberhan Commission, probing the sequence of events leading to the demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992. Its term expired on Monday. The Centre asked the Commission to submit its report on or before February 29, 2008.

1 Nov 2007:

31 Aug 2007: 41st extension[2]

3 July 2007:

4 Apr 2007: [3]

2 Jan 2007: [3]

2006

29 June 2006:

23 March 2006:

2005

12 Dec 2005:

30 Sept 2005: [4]

25 June 2005: [5]

24 March 2005: [6]

2004

9 Sept 2004: [7]

11 March 2004: [8]

2003 30 Jun 2003: [9]

1 Jan 2003: [10]

2002

1 July 2002: [11]

References

  1. ^ "45th extension for Liberhan Commission". The Hindu. 2008-05-01. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
  2. ^ "Time 15 yrs, costs Rs 700 lakh: Liberhan yet to report".
  3. ^ a b three months
  4. ^ three months
  5. ^ three months
  6. ^ three months
  7. ^ six months
  8. ^ six months
  9. ^ six months
  10. ^ six months
  11. ^ six months

Disupted neutrality?[edit]

The article has a notification that there is a dispute on the neutrality of the article in the talk page. Has the dispute been removed or is the notification incorrect? None of the comments here qualify as a dispute about the neutrality of the article unless I have misunderstood them.

--Siddheshp (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Liberhan Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberhan Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Liberhan_Commission&oldid=1203582943"