Talk:List of Mycenaean deities

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To do: Confirm each entry with multiple reputable sources[edit]

Untitled[edit]

This page is a great beginning, and needs some more work. Few of the assertions here have consensus among Mycenologists. I fixed the "definitions" and LB transliterative spellings for a few of the entries, but multiple reputable citations are needed for quite a few of these. Single source, esp. an unpublished PDF source, might not be ideal for citation here. And while Palaeolexicon is awesome, it is also based on a very old lexicon (Hooker), and some of the definitions are either no longer accurate or disputed. k. da-ma-te (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making me aware of this. I’m the user who created this page, I just felt Wikipedia needed a page for Mycenaean deities because it seems like there is a “list of deities” page for every other polytheistic religions.--Russianamerican1 (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Totally agree. This is an awesome start! :) I'll update a few more as I find time. Thanks for putting it together! k. da-ma-te (talk) 20:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
p.s. You might capture a few more unknowns by searching for "theonym" at http://minoan.deaditerranean.com - I don't have all of them listed yet, though. I'm using Documents in Mycenaean Greek 1973 as my initial source, and then updating with more current work as I encounter it. k. da-ma-te (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Potnia[edit]

should we list all the deities with the title Potnia such as Potnia Aswia (po-ta-ni-ja a-sa-wi-a), Potnia Igweja (po-ti-ni-ja i-qe-ja) or should we just list one Potnia and make reference to the others. Potnia is believed to be represented as a separate goddess in some parts of Mycenae. --Russianamerican1 (talk) 23:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

da-ma-te as Demeter[edit]

FYI, I removed the reference the da-ma-te as Demeter, but left the epithet. The etymology has been disproven for da-ma-te as Demeter many times, and there's a great section written on this very topic in "Interpreting the Linear B Records: Some Guidelines" by Yves Duhoux in the 2011 A Companion to Linear B: Mycenaean Greek Texts and their World vol. II (edited by Yves Duhoux and Anna Morpurgo Davies). k. da-ma-te (talk) 19:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Future Plans[edit]

For the record and for any editor reading this:
I have in mind (provided e.g. I'll indeed spend or I'll continue to spend an enormous amound of time and effort on this article, like I have done for the last days), I propose, to add under Heroes, mortals and other entities or concepts (or however this section might be renamed, etc.):

  • A. Attested in Linear B names that are probably anthroponyms but in later times were names of Mytholocigal figures (it's not only Proteus that has been attested).
  • B. Attested Shrine names like *Sphagianes.
  • C. Other relevant stuff that might pop up.

Under their own subsections, I guess.
And of course accompanied by reliable sources.
P.S. Also, under Deities or somewhere, other possibly Creto-Minoan-Mycenaean Gods like *56-ti.
P.P.S. Btw, should I preemptively note that this article may still be regarded as a work in progress?
Thanatos|talk|contributions 18:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hapax Legomenon[edit]

Some Linear B cited in this article is, unfortunately, hapax legomenon in the Linear B corpus. Unless there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence, it's almost always impossible to define a hapax word with any certainty. I propose we strongly consider removing these unless sufficient circumstantial evidence is provided. -kim. (talk) 05:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an entry for these (something I need to fix in the LB Transliterations), so more research needed to check if they're hapax:

  • i-pe-me-de-ja
  • pa-ja-wo-ne
  • qo-wi-ja
  • wa-na-so-i

Some examples of circumstantial evidence which can help corroborate a tentative definition:

  • a-re is parallel to pa-si-te-o-i, making both more likely to belong a single taxonomy.
  • Indo-European and Homeric Greek cognates for po-ti-ni-ja as an epithet if not a theonym
Just for the record, for other editors who might read this:
There is a, let's say, relevant disclaimer; there is also common use of verbs and adjectives or adverbs like "possible-y" as there are accompanying alternative views/interpretations and notes. No false certainty, no presumed certainty; at least not much of it; at least as far as I can tell... ;-)
Thanatos|talk|contributions 06:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ma-ka isn't ma-ka[edit]

Yves Duhoux showed that the sign group originally transliterated as ma-ka at Knossos is actually ma-qe in 2005, and there's no good contextual evidence for ma-ka on the Thebes tablets to imply a theonym, so I went ahead and removed that one entirely. Ref: Kadmos v. 44 (2005) “Adieu au MA-KA Cnossien: une nouvelle lecture en KN F 51 et ses consequence pour les tablettes lineaire B de Thebes” by Yves Duhoux -kim. (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're the scholar, I'm the anonymous internet amateur, but are you sure that removing an entry in its entirety (based on one source/scholar, however prominent) is better than providing in parallel alternative views (elaborating e.g. inside a note)?!? ;-) Thanatos|talk|contributions 06:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Mycenaean deities. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]