Jump to content

Talk:List of active nationalist parties in Europe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The map in the heading (from 2013) doesn't correlate with the more recently updated list further down.

[edit]

If you are going to have a map in the heading of this article, at least keep it updated. Or make a script which updates the map according to the more recently updated data below. Trends in Europe are changing very quickly now, so please keep it updated. 84.210.54.80 (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since noone has answered this request from last year, I have removed it. --Tannkrem (talk) 17:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of active nationalist parties in Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Social democrats regional internationalists included in the same article than neonazis but not the national conservative state-great-parties: Nonsense article

[edit]

What a shameful article!

How could we mix in the same "nationalist" etiquette the populist-nationalist democratic right, the fascist/para-fascist far-right? And even worse the democratic socialist regional left parties?

The Danish People's Party, UKIP, Swiss National Party, etc. (democratic-conservative very populist ones) in the same ideological box than Golden Dawn (roman salute ones! oyu know...)??? Really? Why not the British Conservative Party or Partido Popular from Spain? These two are not less "nationalist" than Swiss People Party. Some of the supposedly "nationalist parties" in the first box are by far, less nationalists not only than Republican Party in United States, but than Democratic Party as well.

And the article becomes a surreal piece of disinformation (or propaganda?) when arrives to the second box... the "regional parties".... Democratic-lefties the majority, some pure liberals, some very soft conservatives, LESS NATIONALIST than every center right "big national party" of Europe and the rest of the World. Some are "hard nationalist" in the populist spectre, as Flemish interest, but the rest are really "internationalists".

SNP, Playd Cymru are pro-immigration, no hard borders, multinational cooperationists, anti-wars, etc, so left internationalist hippies in comparison with French Republicans or german CDU...

Following the logic of this shameful article: A scottish or kurd anarchist (and anti-nationalist with passion, as every anarchist) that was a cultural revivalist or prefer a scottish/kurd confederation to a british/turkish one will be the same thing than the neonazis. But not the hard state-nationalist of every country on the world... Very logic. --87.217.79.188 (talk) 08:58, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is a very poor article, which won't enlighten anyone looking for facts about nationalism in Europe. It is just a list of a bunch of different political parties that have very little in common.
Not even the beginning of the article gives any understanding of the topic, listing a linguist as the main source for this meaningless grouping of political parties. --Tannkrem (talk) 18:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of active nationalist parties in Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of active nationalist parties in Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting proposal

[edit]

I propose that sections right wing populist parties be split into a separate page called List of active right-wing populist parties in Europe. The content of the current page seems off-topic and these sections are large enough to make their own page. Johansweden27 (talk) 08:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

am going to quote ip user above: What a shameful article!

How could we mix in the same "nationalist" etiquette the populist-nationalist democratic right, the fascist/para-fascist far-right? And even worse the democratic socialist regional left parties?

The Danish People's Party, UKIP, Swiss National Party, etc. (democratic-conservative very populist ones) in the same ideological box than Golden Dawn (roman salute ones! oyu know...)??? Really? Why not the British Conservative Party or Partido Popular from Spain? These two are not less "nationalist" than Swiss People Party. Some of the supposedly "nationalist parties" in the first box are by far, less nationalists not only than Republican Party in United States, but than Democratic Party as well.

And the article becomes a surreal piece of disinformation (or propaganda?) when arrives to the second box... the "regional parties".... Democratic-lefties the majority, some pure liberals, some very soft conservatives, LESS NATIONALIST than every center right "big national party" of Europe and the rest of the World. Some are "hard nationalist" in the populist spectre, as Flemish interest, but the rest are really "internationalists".

SNP, Playd Cymru are pro-immigration, no hard borders, multinational cooperationists, anti-wars, etc, so left internationalist hippies in comparison with French Republicans or german CDU...

Following the logic of this shameful article: A scottish or kurd anarchist (and anti-nationalist with passion, as every anarchist) that was a cultural revivalist or prefer a scottish/kurd confederation to a british/turkish one will be the same thing than the neonazis. But not the hard state-nationalist of every country on the world... Very logic. Johansweden27 (talk) 08:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sinn Fein

[edit]

Sinn Fein are technically in power, since the Deputy First Minister in NI has the same power as the First Minister. But, they could also be considered part of the mandatory coalition government in NI. Which colour should be used for their NI section? Alextheconservative (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading article

[edit]

This article has a number of mind boggling editorial problems. As it has been pointed in other comments, the only one image referring only to right/far-right parties and the lack of any clarification in the tables or text seem to imply that far right neonazi parties like Golden Dawn are somehow under the same umbrella as regional social democratic or left anticapitalist pro-independence parties like SNP, ERC or CUP, and including everything in between.

I propose some clean-up, rewrite or split be done. As the article stands, it is downright misleading. Kilgore T (talk) 18:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]