Jump to content

Talk:List of members of the 15th Lok Sabha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Harsh Color Codes

[edit]

I noticed that the color codes used for the various parties were unnecessarily to harsh on the eyes. This also makes text very hard to read for eg :

  1. YSR Congress Party - Blue on blue
  2. JVM(P)- Blue on Dark green

and many more.

This is in complete disregard to the subtle and pleasant color theme used by wikipedia pages and does not destroys the purpose it tries to serve (i.e. easy identification). I would like to know on what basis are these colors assigned to these parties? And why we shouldn't get rid of it in this article. Shubhamkanodia (talk) 08:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Shubhamkanodia. Even blue on red is really hard on the eyes. I will be removing or altering them soon if no objections are raised. NiRinsanity 16:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of members of the 15th Lok Sabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]