Talk:Liv Flaherty

Liv Flaherty has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 5, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Television: Emmerdale Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Emmerdale task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Liv Flaherty/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

Infobox looks good.
"write her" → "wrote her"
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove the comma after "authority".
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"on a soap opera" → "in a soap opera" (might be WP:ENGVAR)
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Quotes in the lead are cited.

Casting and characterisation[edit]

Remove the comma after "her character".
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Besides that, this section looks good.

Development[edit]

Remove the comma after "Sandra accepts".
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also remove the comma after "(Eden Taylor-Draper)".
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"afore mentioned" → "aforementioned"
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Aaron, and that both him" → "Aaron and that both he"
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The phrase "she it would" in #Alcoholism_and_imprisonment sounds off.
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"unaware who" → "unaware of who"
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"show him understanding" → "show him the understanding"
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"worked with British" → "worked with the British"
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a word missing between "tells father" in the last section?
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove the comma after "wedding day to Mandy".
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Remove the comma after "nominated again".
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is well-sourced so this section looks good.
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Sources are already archived.
- I've added a couple of new references but my "fix dead links" tool to archive them is not working for a reason I don't know? Does it work for you Some Dude From North Carolina or Chompy Ace? – DarkGlow • 14:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This might be due to the sources not being archived at the Wayback Machine (the tool simply copies links to archives and adds them to articles), but I'll pass the article since my main suggestions have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that it literally isn't loading – everything else on both my laptop and phone are loading but the tool. I'll try it again later. Thank you for the review! – DarkGlow • 15:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mention it, the tool isn't loading on my laptop either. Guess it's not working today. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think Daily Express is reliable per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Express.

Done removed Chompy Ace 14:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done by replacing them with reliable referencing. – DarkGlow • 14:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mark references from The Daily Telegraph with "|url-access=registration".
- Done – DarkGlow • 14:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·