Talk:Lloyd's List

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Lloyd's List deserves its own entry

I have removed the merger suggestion from this page. As one of the longest continuously published newspapers in the world, Lloyd's List should not be merged into an article about a company that was created less than ten years ago. It woulf be like merging 'yoghurt' into 'Danone'. CanadrianUK (talk) 10:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title correction

The title is now Lloyds List. But the paper's heading says: 'Lloyd's List'. This being alseo the right way of speling, innit, I suggest to change the title into Lloyd's List. It takes a swapping, since the suggested new title is now a redirect. -DePiep 14:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

User:Btball has tagged this page to be merged with Informa because that is now the parent company. Considering Lloyd's List has a very long and distinguished history, and still operates under its own name, I see no reason for a merger. That would be like merging Vought with Carlyle Group just because they were bought out. And even if there was a name change, Lloyd's List is still notable for its history, just like there is a separate Lockheed article from Lockheed Martin. Joshdboz (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, merge disapproved. We don't do by owner DePiep (talk) 16:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lloyd's List. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lr.org/services_overview/shipping_information/is016edward_lloyd.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lloyd's List. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040107070325/http://www.wan-press.org/article2823.html to http://www.wan-press.org/article2823.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox request

--— Safety Cap (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]