Talk:Lois Roden

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seventh-day Adventist Church

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Removal of hearsay regarding Lois claiming pregnancy by Koresh

David Koresh is said to have publicly denied this, while at the same time speaking of Lois in demeaning terms. Besides, there is no proof one way or the other on this bit of "information" and therefore it does not belong in Wikipedia. --H.b. 23:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a complete hagiography without any critical comments on her life and works. --84.188.243.21 22:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This needs work, it seems a bit biased. BURNyA 23:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very, actually, and it doesn't even give basic biographical info. I am working on that at Benjamin Roden at the moment but I'm unlikely to deal with the religious stuff because it usually baffles me. - Sitush (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]