Jump to content

Talk:Lomandra multiflora

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with assessment

[edit]

Hi there, I'm a university student and for my course I need to improve a stub. I have added new sections to Lomandra Multiflora, I would really appreciate any feedback and I will continue to add more onto the page until the 31st of May. It would be great if I could get the stub improved to a c or b level ! Rachelw07 (talk) 01:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on this article, you have made great contributions. I have made a number of edits, I sorry, I assume because of the captalization of the species and subspecies names in the text that you do not come from a biology background. In which case you have done a very good job in this unfamiliar area. What can improve the article? I would like to see the description section with a heading. I would like to see more images (good luck with that, it can be very easy or really difficult), the lead sentence/paragraph needs to tempt the reader, what sort of vegetation community is the plant found in, what other species of plant or animal have relationships, what human use is there for the plant. More on that, have a look at the ethnobotanical literature, particularly in one of the many works that Glenn Wightman has co-authored (if not in your university's library, ask the librarian about interlibrary loans or if there is an equivalent of Victoria's CAVAL card, if it still exists?) Your local library (the local council run library) is also a resource. Getting it up to B or C, well that depends on quality of info and writing and presentation and so on. Research, include at appropriate sections a summary, re-read your work when 'cold', i.e. take a break from the article (at least 1 hour, better 1 day) and then read it through, making edit notes. Good luck and again thank you for improving WP. Brunswicknic (talk) 12:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for the feedback and for improving my edits, I really appreciate it! I will try my best to add onto the article :) Rachelw07 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]