Talk:Lower Burdekin languages

Lower Burdekin languages was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 1, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Australia: Queensland / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lower Burdekin languages is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

older comments

Are there any guesses about what Aboriginal language family they might be related to or are they treated as a language isolate? I don't see them listed on the Aboriginal Languages page. Eluchil404 20:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The most obvious guess would be Pama-Nyungan, but I don't really know. R.M.W. Dixon treats them as their own small family, but he's against the Pama-Nyungan theory altogether—he treats everything as a small-to-mid family. --Ptcamn 22:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

failed GA

I know the subject has very little available content. since there are only short list of known words maybe a portion of those list could be added with translation to english. Also the link is to a general home page, the link should be more direct. Also as it talks about three different languages suggest that a paragraph on each be developed with with source information who, when, where it was collect from whom if known. Gnangarra 13:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh and be certain, with such a small article to speculate by saying probably three literally destroys the following information. What its saying is we think this but we dont know so we have a guess, therefore the whole piece is a guess. Gnangarra 13:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]