Talk:Lumholtz's tree-kangaroo

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lumholtz's tree-kangaroo is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

Why heavy-bodied, when it is the smallest tree-kangaroo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.121.168 (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Expansion

I work with a tree kangaroo awareness group in Far North Queensland and would like to contribute more information to this page. Please introduce yourself if you would like to collaborate with my edits. Gazelle13 (talk) 07:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lumholtz's tree-kangaroo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lumholtz’s “discovery”

Hi Wikipedians, I think we can tweak the language surrounding Lumholtz’s “discovery”, especially given that aboriginal communities have their own word for this creature, and indeed the forests where it lives are named after it (“mapi” or “mabi”). Maybe Lumholtz collected or described the first specimen for science, but there is good evidence that it was actually discovered by humans long before any white person “discovered” Australia. Thoughts on this? Illinoisjoe (talk) 23:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]