This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Lusitanian War is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations.
If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
"See also" section and sidebar template removal[edit]
I removed the sidebar template because it was just a disruption, same reason I removed the headings. They divided up a short article and made it more difficult to grasp the topic. This article is not yet long enough for (two!) sections (not counting notes, references, see also). The See also section was full of meaningless links, which, if relevant, should appear in the article text, not tacked on at the bottom. I removed all of them except for one. If anybody objects that the article does not integrate the topic into the rest of our material on Portuguese history sufficiently, I suggest the article be expanded so that it can accomodate a sidebar template without being squeezed to 2/3 width OR that a footer template be used instead OR that some creative linking be used to connect it to articles like history of Portugal. A paragraph could be added to show the reader why this topic is of interest to the history of Portugal, since an educated reader will quickly realise that the date of this war precedes anything remotely Portuguese by almost a millennium. Srnec (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article on Viriathus seems to cover this issue in better context and more detail than this article. I would seem to be a good idea to incorporate much of the Viriathus article into this. Droopyfeathers (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
