Jump to content

Talk:Lydia Taft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article "Lyida Taft" should not be deleted. It is based on local history of the Blackstone Valley which is now a NPS site, national Park Service. Lydia Taft is a historical figure, properly categorized as people from Massachusetts. The "2007-29-09" is not a separate article. The web link retrieval date just kept displaying in red in the core article on Lydia Taft. So any separate article "2007=29-09" is not appropriate. It is just the access date of the weblink. The source materials for the Lydia Taft article are from the Blackstone Daily, a local publication in Massachusetts, and its websites. The Massachusetts legislature and the Town of Uxbridge Meeting records are also source materials. thanks. User:ksherin|2007-01-10|UTC:05:59


Since these two articles deal exclusively with one person, there is no need to have them separated. Text from America's First Woman Voter should be merged into this article. Ground Zero | t 21:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lydia Taft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]