|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MG 08 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
How was the water circulated in and out of the barrel sleave?
Discrepancy between English and German entry for Maschinengewehr08
I just read through the german entry for Maschinengewehr 08, which states that Germany was in possesion of 4919 MG08s at the start of WWI, while the english entry lists a numer of "aprox. 12000" MG08s available to german battle units at the start of WWI in August 1918. I have no means of checking this numer, so I leave this here as a comment for someone who has. 184.108.40.206 20:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
== Poor use of English words and extremely long and awkward sentence structures in the last paragraph.
This is really pulling down the whole story to a low level. The subject is too serious to be messed with by amateur historians. Now last paragraph has been corrected220.127.116.11 (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC) I have an M.G.08. Serial#49478 D.W.M.Berlin 1918.It has 2 wooden handles that unscrew at top.One looked to be a wire brush and the other looks like a small soft brissle brush.Some of the other numbers and letters on the right side are as follows:9478,DWM with 2 small engravers mark.It also has a slide button on a scale,that is numbered from 0 up to 70.It looks like it could be fired singluary or full.It also has 2 safety's.Cheers ! firstname.lastname@example.org —Preceding unsigned comment added by Congotom (talk • contribs) 03:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Not going to add a definitive answer, since it's not my area, but this is precisely why we don't "translate" calibers in aircraft articles! :) --Rlandmann (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
These were all manufactured or re-manufactured to fire the rimmed 7.62x53R round thats similar to the Russian 7,62x54R, with some variation in bullet and case dimensions something like in .223 Remington vs 5.56x45mm NATO, sometimes being unsafe or inaccurate if "cross fired" from a weapon intended for the another. Maybe this should be mentioned in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 16:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- You need to read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability. The text you are adding may be completely factual but it still must be verifiable, and free web pages are not suitable sources. ROG5728 (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
File:German Infantry 1916.JPG Nominated for Deletion
|An image used in this article, File:German Infantry 1916.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
|A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.|
Use by Austro-Hungarian units
Is there any proof at all that confirms use of this machinegun by Austria-Hungary? I haven't found a single picture or other source that confirms this claim. M11rtinb (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)