Talk:MKER

Binned?

It's a well known fact that the Leningrad NPP is being built using VVER units. The MKER design has been binned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.176.11 (talk • contribs)

The VVER-Units being built at the Leningrad NPP 2. The MKER-Units are planned for the Leningrad NPP. These are two different plants. --217.5.204.78 (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kursk Nuclear Power Plant suggests that Kursk is all of RBMK design, including the cancelled units 5 and 6. And Kursk-II is of VVER. These articles seem to be conflicting, as there is no mention of MKER on the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant page. I'd guess that the MKER page is out of date ("Unit 5 is currently under construction") and the MKER page is inaccurate, where at least Unit 5 should be of MKER type rather than RBMK-1000?? Can someone clarify? --Hypertext (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Our article at Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant covers both LNPP-I and LNPP-II. There's no mention there of MKERs. Andrewa (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The last significant content update of the article seems to have been in 2012 [1] so it's likely to be out of date. Andrewa (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on MKER. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]